| 华夏收藏网 > 玉器估价 > 是石灰沁还是酸咬 |
| 是石灰沁还是酸咬 日期:2008-05-05 来自藏友:[玉润斋] 您是本文第438个阅读者 [加入我的收藏夹,方便查看] |
Time:2008-5-5 20:38:25 [Ip:117.61.72.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:41:48 [Ip:117.61.72.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:50:05 [Ip:218.23.192.*]
一眼假
Time:2008-5-5 20:59:07 [Ip:117.61.72.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:28:29 [Ip:222.82.215.*]
学习了。
Time:2008-5-6 0:11:20 [Ip:60.19.162.*]
学习了 顶下吉师 说真的 不同的料子用同样酸结果可不一样 俺这好多师傅小学文化都没有 是什么酸都不知道 可也在加工 好多问题就是人为的把它复杂化了 佣人自扰吧
Time:2008-5-6 7:19:53 [Ip:211.141.132.*]
Time:2008-5-6 13:02:06 [Ip:117.61.72.*]
Time:2008-5-6 17:01:25 [Ip:218.22.229.*]
Time:2008-5-6 21:35:50 [Ip:117.61.72.*]
Time:2008-5-6 22:12:46 [Ip:121.32.146.*]
鸡虱包作假的心得不赖,看青海的更是晕晕乎乎,39楼的能跟你辩清楚吗?而看来帮派分子之间也有配合不好的时候,将假玩意给看成春秋的.因此水平不济,靠拉帮结派相互吹嘘也许一时间蒙的了人,始终是要丢人的.
Time:2008-6-3 21:12:11 [Ip:123.120.216.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:14:28 [Ip:222.94.225.*]
石灰皮和酸咬,有时在网上看图片,拍的角度、透光度、焦距等原因,不一定能看出个啥。
Time:2008-5-5 20:15:28 [Ip:222.94.225.*]
‘沁’打成‘皮’了,更正一下,混一分。
Time:2008-5-5 20:16:49 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:24:32 [Ip:221.221.126.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:24:55 [Ip:58.20.66.*]
千顶帆顶对
Time:2008-5-5 20:25:31 [Ip:222.94.225.*]
你感谢我,我就再来一遍。
Time:2008-5-5 20:26:01 [Ip:222.242.184.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:26:48 [Ip:58.20.66.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:28:05 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:30:53 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:35:36 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 20:48:55 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 21:01:22 [Ip:124.72.232.*]
Time:2008-5-5 21:23:59 [Ip:218.79.54.*]
Time:2008-5-5 21:36:56 [Ip:60.218.4.*]
Time:2008-5-5 21:41:01 [Ip:122.77.17.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:03:04 [Ip:58.20.66.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:12:27 [Ip:60.218.4.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:13:43 [Ip:124.72.74.*]
看图,阴线好象崩口比较严重,这能说明什么吗
Time:2008-5-5 22:23:31 [Ip:61.174.135.*]
吉师说的是实验的方法,从方法上是可行的,但从结果上不一定会很理想。
Time:2008-5-5 22:24:43 [Ip:61.174.135.*]
不好意思,在这里批评了一下专家,幸亏老师们都说华网没专家。
Time:2008-5-5 22:29:03 [Ip:221.221.126.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:29:53 [Ip:61.174.135.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:38:31 [Ip:222.41.157.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:45:37 [Ip:116.28.82.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:46:11 [Ip:221.221.126.*]
Time:2008-5-5 22:52:21 [Ip:222.41.157.*]
Time:2008-5-5 23:00:35 [Ip:222.41.157.*]
Time:2008-5-5 23:07:54 [Ip:222.41.157.*]
Time:2008-5-5 23:12:52 [Ip:61.174.135.*]
Time:2008-5-5 23:29:15 [Ip:222.131.252.*]
好贴子,赞一下,玻璃光的成因必须具备几种条件,一是玉质要好,如和田玉质,质地比较质密,二是打磨抛光如较到位,属称地子平,三是坑口要好,如干坑出土玻璃光玉器较多,湿坑则较少!各朝各代均有玻璃光的玉器出现!
Time:2008-5-5 23:35:20 [Ip:222.131.252.*]
抄一段书上的:玻璃光是战国和明代玉器中常有的一种现象,但两者的成因不同,战国的玻璃光,是当时较精美的玉器在制成之后,被仔细的用兽皮抛光过,入土后受到的浸蚀又不太严重,相反还给他包了一层浆。显得光亮而柔和。而明代的玻璃光,则是因为琢磨时铊子的转速较快而造成的光,通常显得“硬”一些。同时因为明代玉器大多数没有入过土,它就不可能出现战国玉器那种温润柔和的包浆。
Time:2008-5-6 0:02:02 [Ip:221.221.126.*]
Time:2008-5-6 9:16:45 [Ip:61.153.237.*]
Time:2008-5-6 11:30:14 [Ip:125.82.3.*]
Time:2008-5-6 12:48:59 [Ip:61.51.254.*]
先看刀工,器型,玉质等,没问题了再看沁.刀工都过不去就不用看别的了.
Time:2008-5-6 13:23:34 [Ip:222.187.144.*]
Time:2008-5-6 17:05:23 [Ip:58.208.132.*]
Time:2008-5-6 21:26:51 [Ip:60.186.201.*]
Time:2008-5-6 22:28:48 [Ip:60.186.201.*]
Time:2008-5-7 1:55:35 [Ip:210.5.136.*]
Time:2008-5-8 1:43:01 [Ip:211.155.99.*]
Time:2008-5-10 9:58:16 [Ip:123.164.9.*]
Time:2008-5-11 16:32:38 [Ip:116.28.129.*]
Time:2008-6-26 21:13:24 [Ip:124.77.184.*]
从雕工造型来讲,应是上古之物,从包浆,沁蚀来看不足,矛盾很大,后方可能性大,最后一张是判断的最可靠依据,其他有光线影响判断,